Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Section 11 exemption restored after electronic filing of Form 10B deemed sufficient for rectification purposes

        M/s. Shree Goverdhan Nathji Haveli Trust Versus The Income Tax Officer, Exemptions, Ward – 3, Bangalore

        M/s. Shree Goverdhan Nathji Haveli Trust Versus The Income Tax Officer, Exemptions, Ward – 3, Bangalore - TMI Issues Involved:
        1. Disallowance of exemption claimed under Section 11 due to non-electronic filing of Form 10B.
        2. Rectification order under Section 154 adding Rs. 42,85,977 to the returned income.
        3. Delay in filing Form 10B and its impact on exemption claims.
        4. Applicability of CBDT Circular dated 22/05/2019.
        5. Consideration of gross receipts and expenditure for tax liability.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Disallowance of Exemption Claimed Under Section 11 Due to Non-Electronic Filing of Form 10B:
        The appellant argued that the authorities erred in disallowing the exemption claimed under Section 11 for Rs. 42,85,977 on the grounds that Form 10B was not filed electronically. The appellant had obtained the audit report but failed to file it electronically with the return of income. The authorities did not consider that the appellant had filed Form 10B before the rectification order under Section 154 was passed. The Tribunal noted that the scope of Section 143(1) is restricted to adjustments of prima facie mistakes and omissions apparent from the record. The Tribunal referenced judicial precedents, including the decision in Khatau Junker v Pathania, which held that deductions cannot be disallowed merely because a specific document was not annexed to the return unless explicitly required by the Act. The Tribunal concluded that the electronically filed Form 10B should have been considered, and the deduction under Section 11 should not have been denied.

        2. Rectification Order Under Section 154 Adding Rs. 42,85,977 to the Returned Income:
        The appellant contended that the AO erred in passing a rectification order under Section 154 by adding Rs. 42,85,977 to the returned income without considering the facts and circumstances. The Tribunal observed that the adjustment made by CPC, Bengaluru, was due to the non-filing of Form 10B electronically. The Tribunal noted that the Form 10B was filed electronically before the rectification application under Section 154, and thus, the AO should have considered this for necessary remedial action. The Tribunal cited the case of Pane Hindu Devalaya Mandal Vs DCIT, where it was held that the exemption under Section 11(2) cannot be rejected solely because Form 10 was not filed electronically. The Tribunal remanded the issue to the AO for verification and consideration of Form 10B.

        3. Delay in Filing Form 10B and Its Impact on Exemption Claims:
        The appellant argued that the authorities erred in not condoning the delay in filing Form 10B and dismissing the appeal without adjudicating the merits. The Tribunal referenced the CBDT Circular dated 22/05/2019, which allowed for the condonation of delay in filing Form 10B. The Tribunal also cited the case of Shree Dadar Jain Paushadhshala Trust Vs. ITO, where the Tribunal allowed the exemption claim despite the delayed filing of Form 10B. The Tribunal concluded that the delay should have been condoned, and the exemption under Section 11 should have been considered.

        4. Applicability of CBDT Circular Dated 22/05/2019:
        The appellant argued that the authorities failed to apply the CBDT Circular dated 22/05/2019, which relates to the delay in filing Form 10B. The Tribunal noted that the Circular authorizes the Commissioners of Income-tax to admit belated applications in Form No. 9A and Form No.10 for AY 2016-17. The Tribunal held that the authorities should have applied this Circular and considered the delayed filing of Form 10B.

        5. Consideration of Gross Receipts and Expenditure for Tax Liability:
        The appellant contended that the AO erred in considering the gross receipts, including corpus donations, and arriving at the tax liability without considering the expenditure on charitable activities. The appellant collected Rs. 22,31,019 as contributions not forming part of the corpus and spent Rs. 25,05,809 towards charitable activities. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue in detail but remanded the case to the AO for verification and consideration of Form 10B, which indirectly impacts the consideration of gross receipts and expenditure.

        Conclusion:
        The Tribunal concluded that the issue needs to be remanded to the AO for necessary verification and consideration of Form 10B. The AO is directed to consider the claim of the assessee under Section 11(2) in accordance with the law, ensuring proper opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found