Appeals dismissed as time-barred under Finance Act, 1944. High Court writ petition unsuccessful. Legal precedents upheld.

The appeals were dismissed as time-barred by the Tribunal, upholding the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 85(3) of the Finance Act, 1944. Despite attempts to challenge the dismissal through a writ petition in the High Court, the delay in filing the appeals was deemed excessive, exceeding the permissible time frame even after excluding time spent in court proceedings. The Tribunal found no fault in the original decision and concluded that the appeals were rightly dismissed based on established legal principles and precedents.

---

---

Issues:
Appeal against dismissal as time-barred by Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 85(3) of the Finance Act, 1944.

Analysis:
The appellant filed appeals against the impugned order dismissing their appeals as time-barred by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals). The adjudication order was issued on 27.01.2017, challenged in the Hon’ble High Court through a writ petition, and finally disposed of on 28.03.2018. Subsequently, the appeals were filed on 14.08.2018, leading to their dismissal by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) based on Section 85(3) of the Finance Act, 1944. The Tribunal referred to a previous case where it was established that the time limit for filing appeals can be extended by 30 days upon showing sufficient reason for the delay. In this instance, despite the writ petitions to the High Court, no specific date of filing was provided, and a delay of over 4 months occurred before applying for a certified copy of the order. Even after receiving the certified copy, the appeals were filed more than 15 days after. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the appeals were highly time-barred, even after excluding the time spent before the High Court. The Tribunal found no fault in the impugned order and upheld the dismissal of the appeals as time-barred by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals).

In conclusion, since the issue had been previously addressed by the Tribunal and no errors were found in the impugned order, the appeals were rightfully dismissed as time-barred by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals). Therefore, the appeals were ultimately dismissed by the Tribunal, following the established legal principles and precedents.

---