Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the attachment and freezing of the corporate debtor's bank account for pre-CIRP commercial tax dues could be sustained after commencement of CIRP and whether the amount debited from the account was liable to be refunded.
Analysis: On admission of CIRP, moratorium operates immediately and the Resolution Professional assumes control over the corporate debtor's management, assets, and bank accounts. Any recovery step by a taxing authority that attaches or freezes the corporate debtor's account after commencement of CIRP interferes with the statutory duties of the Resolution Professional and is contrary to the moratorium. The claimed tax dues are to be pursued by lodging a claim in the CIRP rather than by coercive recovery from the debtor's account. Since the bank also had no objection to defreezing, the freeze could not continue and the amount already debited from the account could not be retained by the recovery authority.
Conclusion: The attachment order was unsustainable, the bank account was directed to be defreezed, and the amount debited from the corporate debtor's account was directed to be refunded.
Ratio Decidendi: After commencement of CIRP, coercive recovery against the corporate debtor's assets is barred by moratorium and pre-CIRP dues must be pursued through the insolvency claims process, not by attachment or debit from the debtor's bank account.