Taxpayer's Claim Upheld for 2 Flats as One Unit under Section 54

The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s decision to allow the taxpayer's claim for exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act for investing in two flats, treating them as one residential unit. The Tribunal found merit in the taxpayer's argument based on relevant case law, concluding that the taxpayer could claim deduction for reinvestment in both flats as a single residential property. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the directive to permit the deduction under section 54 for the purchase of both flats.

---

---

Issues:
1. Claim of exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act for the purchase of two flats.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the allowance of deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The case involved an individual taxpayer who declared an income of &8377;2,90,72,790 and claimed exemption under section 54 for investing in two flats. The Assessing Officer initially restricted the exemption to one flat, leading to a higher taxable long term capital gain. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed both grounds raised under section 54, following relevant case law. The Revenue contended that the taxpayer was not entitled to claim exemption for more than one house under section 54. The taxpayer argued in favor of the appellate order.

Upon review, the Tribunal considered the factual aspects and case law presented. The taxpayer had purchased two adjacent flats, which were treated as one residential unit with common facilities. Referring to the decision in CIT v. D. Ananda Basappa, where exemption was allowed for the purchase of two flats combined into one unit, the Tribunal found merit in the taxpayer's claim. Despite separate flat numbers, the flats were interconnected and formed a single residential property. The Tribunal concluded that the taxpayer could claim deduction under section 54 for reinvesting in both flats as one residential unit.

Regarding the alternate plea that even if treated as two separate units, exemption should still apply under section 54, the Tribunal invoked the decision in CIT v. V.R. Karpagam. This case law, although under section 54F, was deemed applicable to section 54 due to similarities in provisions. The Tribunal highlighted that the interpretation of "a residential house" in section 54F should align with section 54. Therefore, the principles established in V.R. Karpagam's case were deemed relevant to the present case, supporting the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s decision to allow the deduction for both flats. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the directive to permit the deduction under section 54 for reinvestment in both flats.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to allow the taxpayer's claim for exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act for the investment in two flats, treating them as one residential unit. The judgment emphasized the applicability of relevant case law and statutory interpretations in determining the eligibility for deductions under the Act.

---