Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail in respect of the alleged offence under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, pending investigation and before cognizance.
Analysis: The application arose from allegations under Section 132(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The investigation was still pending and no charge-sheet had been submitted. The request for protection was considered in the context of the nature of the accusation, the applicant's antecedents, the stage of investigation, the principles governing arrest and anticipatory bail, and the prevailing Covid-19 situation. The protection granted was confined to a limited period, namely until cognizance is taken on the police report, with conditions to ensure cooperation with investigation and compliance with the order.
Conclusion: Anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant for a limited period till cognizance is taken on the police report, subject to the stated conditions.