Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving non-bailable offences where the applicant pleaded apprehension of arrest during the Covid-19 pandemic, and whether the threat to life and health could justify protection under the anticipatory bail jurisdiction.
Analysis: The anticipatory bail framework under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was treated as discretionary and flexible, with the Court emphasising that no fixed formula governs grant or refusal. The reasoning gave primacy to the constitutional protections of life and personal liberty under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. On the facts, the Court considered the pandemic conditions, the risk of infection during arrest, detention, production before the Magistrate, and incarceration, and held that the apprehension of death from Covid-19 could constitute a valid ground for anticipatory bail in the prevailing extraordinary situation.
Conclusion: Anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant on the ground that the existing pandemic conditions created a sufficient apprehension to life warranting protection from arrest.
Final Conclusion: The applicant received anticipatory bail for the specified limited period, subject to conditions, on the basis that the prevailing public health emergency justified departure from the ordinary approach to anticipatory bail.
Ratio Decidendi: In extraordinary pandemic conditions, a real apprehension to life arising from arrest and custody can itself furnish a valid ground for anticipatory bail, and the Court may exercise its discretion to protect life and liberty under the constitutional framework.