Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether gas stove ignitors were covered by Entry 39 of the Central Excise Tariff as a mechanical or chemical contrivance for causing ignition.
Analysis: The goods were found to be mechanical or chemical contrivances for causing ignition and to be portable, inasmuch as they could be easily taken from one place to another and used there. On that basis, the elements of Entry 39 were treated as satisfied.
Conclusion: The goods fell within Entry 39 of the Central Excise Tariff and the revision application was liable to fail, against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The classification dispute was decided against the petitioners and the revisional challenge was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods that satisfy the descriptive elements of a tariff entry, including their functional character and portability where relevant, are classifiable within that entry.