Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to suspension of the substantive sentence of imprisonment pending disposal of the criminal revision petition and to exemption from surrendering before the trial court.
Analysis: The conviction arose from offences under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioners relied on alleged infirmities, inconsistencies, and contradictions in the prosecution case. The Court noted that the revision raised arguable points and that the matter was not likely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future, which justified interim relief during pendency of the revision.
Conclusion: The petitioners were entitled to suspension of the substantive sentence of imprisonment and exemption from surrender, subject to the conditions imposed by the Court.