Tribunal allows salary disallowance, remands rent & interest issues for reassessment

The Tribunal allowed the disallowance of salary paid to security guards in favor of the assessee due to sufficient confirmation provided. The issue of disallowance of shop and godown rent was remanded to the AO for further verification. The disallowance of interest on advances was also remanded for reevaluation based on commercial expediency. The disallowance of alleged low household expenses was deemed speculative and ordered to be deleted. Grounds 6 and 7 were dismissed as general, and the appeal was partly allowed.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Disallowance of salary paid to security guards
2. Disallowance of shop and godown rent
3. Disallowance of interest on advances
4. Disallowance of alleged low household expenses

Issue 1: Disallowance of salary paid to security guards:
The AO disallowed Rs. 3,24,000 paid to four individual security guards for not deducting tax under section 194-C. The CIT(A) upheld the addition due to lack of conclusive evidence. However, the Tribunal found the confirmation provided by the assessee sufficient, ruling that absence of payment mode details should not discredit the payments. The Tribunal allowed this issue in favor of the assessee.

Issue 2: Disallowance of shop and godown rent:
The AO disallowed Rs. 3,56,379 shop and godown rent due to lack of response from the assessee. The CIT(A) dismissed the claim citing insufficient documentary evidence. The Tribunal remanded the issue to the AO for further verification, giving the assessee another opportunity to substantiate the rent payments.

Issue 3: Disallowance of interest on advances:
The AO disallowed Rs. 86,410 as proportionate interest on interest-free advances. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, questioning the commercial expediency of the advances. The Tribunal remanded the issue to the AO, directing a reevaluation based on substantiated commercial expediency or capital reserves exceeding the advances.

Issue 4: Disallowance of alleged low household expenses:
The AO disallowed Rs. 25,000 for low household expenses based on assumptions. The Tribunal found the disallowance speculative and ordered the AO to delete it, as no evidence of extravagant expenditure was presented. The Tribunal allowed this issue in favor of the assessee.

General:
Grounds 6 and 7 were dismissed as general in nature. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal pronounced the order on 28.05.2021.

This judgment addressed various issues including disallowances related to salary payments, rent, interest on advances, and household expenses, providing detailed analysis and rulings on each matter.

---