Arm's length agent remuneration defeats further profit attribution from an alleged dependent agency permanent establishment.

Where a dependent agency permanent establishment is alleged, no further profit can be attributed to the foreign enterprise if the Indian agent is remunerated at arm's length. The Tribunal applied binding jurisdictional precedent on profit attribution in a DAPE situation and noted that the transfer pricing order had accepted the arm's length nature of the agent's remuneration, with no deficiency shown. As the basic taxability arising from the alleged DAPE failed, no additional income was taxable in India in the hands of the foreign enterprise, and the related issues on royalty treatment, attribution, double taxation and interest became academic.

---

---

Issues: Whether the existence of a dependent agency permanent establishment resulted in any taxable income in India when the Indian agent was remunerated at arm's length.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the tax consequences of a dependent agency permanent establishment and whether any further profit could be attributed to the foreign enterprise over and above the arm's length remuneration paid to the Indian agent. Following the binding jurisdictional precedent on profit attribution in a DAPE situation, the Tribunal held that where the agent is compensated at arm's length, nothing further survives for taxation in the hands of the foreign enterprise. On the facts, the transfer pricing order had accepted the arm's length nature of the transactions, and no deficiency in the agent's remuneration was shown. Once the basic taxability on account of the alleged DAPE failed, the remaining grounds on royalty treatment, attribution, double taxation and interest became academic.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and no additional income was held taxable in India on account of the alleged DAPE.

---