Software sale receipts and dependent agent attribution fail where arm's length remuneration already covers the Indian agent's functions and risks.

Receipts from the sale of software products were treated as non-taxable royalty income under binding precedent, so they did not give rise to Indian tax as royalty. On the dependent agency permanent establishment issue, the governing principle applied was that attribution does not arise where the Indian agent is already remunerated at arm's length for functions performed, assets employed and risks assumed. As no deficiency in that arm's length compensation was established, no further income survived for attribution to the foreign enterprise, and the connected grounds on gross basis taxation and ancillary adjustments also fell away.

---

---

Issues: Whether the receipts from sale of software products were taxable in India as royalties or business income and whether any further income could be attributed to the alleged dependent agency permanent establishment when the Indian agent was remunerated at arm's length.

Analysis: The issue was covered by binding precedent holding that the sale of software products did not give rise to taxable royalty income. On the question of permanent establishment, the governing principle applied was that a dependent agency permanent establishment is tax-neutral where the Indian agent has been compensated at arm's length for the functions performed, assets employed and risks assumed. Since the transfer pricing position already showed arm's length remuneration and no deficiency in that remuneration was established, nothing further survived for attribution in the hands of the foreign enterprise. The connected grounds concerning attribution, gross basis taxation and ancillary adjustments therefore did not survive for adjudication.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue, and the additions made on the basis of royalty characterization and DAPE attribution were not sustainable.

---