Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether carbon-tissue paper treated with dichromate solution and dried was correctly classifiable as sensitised paper under Central Excise Tariff Item No. 37C(2).
Analysis: The paper, after treatment with potassium dichromate and drying, became sensitive to light and was used for photogravure purposes. The relevant tariff entry covered sensitised paper, and the scope of the allied nomenclature showed that photographic goods included papers and other materials sensitive to light or other radiations, including those used for photo-mechanical engraving. The fact that the paper functioned as a support and was later discarded after exposure and development did not alter its character at the stage of classification, because the later separation of film and paper was only a subsequent processing step.
Conclusion: The product was correctly treated as sensitised paper under Tariff Item No. 37C(2), and the revision failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A paper product that, after chemical treatment, becomes sensitive to light and answers the description of sensitised paper is classifiable by its essential character at the relevant stage, and later processing or discard of a supporting layer does not change that classification.