Tariff classification of industrial electrodes: specific entry applied, residuary entry rejected, and a new notice ground could not be relied on.

Magnetite electrodes imported without copper coating and copper strips were treated as apparatus or component parts specially shaped for use in an industrial system, so they fell within entry 72(c) or 72(3) rather than the residuary entry 87. The court noted that the copper coating only improved efficiency and was not indispensable to the goods' essential character or use. It also held that the consumable-material reasoning could not support the classification because that ground had not been put to the importer in the show-cause notice, and the classification was vitiated by reliance on irrelevant considerations. The impugned customs order was set aside and the writ petition succeeded.

---

---

Issues: Whether magnetite electrodes imported without copper coating and copper strips were classifiable under entry 72(c) or 72(3), or under the residuary entry 87, and whether the impugned classification was vitiated by irrelevant considerations and denial of opportunity on a new ground.

Analysis: The electrodes were found to be apparatus or component parts specially shaped for use in an industrial system and capable of functioning as imported. The copper coating improved efficiency but was not indispensable to their use or essential to their character. The reasoning that the goods were not fully finished, or that they were merely consumable material, did not fit the language of entries 72(c) or 72(3), and the consumable-material point had not been put to the petitioner in the show-cause notice. The residuary entry could not be invoked where the goods answered the specific entries, and the impugned order was founded on considerations not germane to the tariff description.

Conclusion: The goods were rightly classifiable under entry 72(c) or 72(3), not under entry 87, and the impugned order could not stand.

Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, the customs classification was set aside, and the bank guarantees were directed to be discharged with costs.

Ratio Decidendi: Where goods answer a specific tariff entry as apparatus or component parts designed for an industrial system, a mere additional finishing process that improves efficiency does not justify resort to a residuary entry.

---