Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (4) TMI 1085 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeal partly allowed, Revenue's appeal dismissed. Tribunal directs reconsideration of comparables. Order pronounced April 26, 2021. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal directed the TPO/AO to reconsider ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Appeal partly allowed, Revenue's appeal dismissed. Tribunal directs reconsideration of comparables. Order pronounced April 26, 2021.

                          The assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal directed the TPO/AO to reconsider certain comparables and verify specific details for proper adjudication. The order was pronounced on April 26, 2021.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Misconstruction of functional and risk profile by CIT(A).
                          2. Erroneous exclusion and inclusion of comparables by TPO and CIT(A).
                          3. Rejection of R Systems International Limited as a comparable.
                          4. Inclusion of TCS E-Serve International Limited and TCS E-Serve Limited as comparables.
                          5. Treatment of gain/loss from foreign exchange variation and provision for doubtful debts.
                          6. Non-granting of appropriate risk adjustments under Rule 10B.
                          7. Treatment of third-party cost recoveries for applying the mark-up.
                          8. Treatment of outstanding receivables from AE as an unsecured loan and charging interest thereon.
                          9. Exclusion of certain companies from the comparables list by CIT(A) in Revenue's appeal.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Misconstruction of Functional and Risk Profile:
                          The assessee argued that CIT(A) misconstrued its functional and risk profile. This ground was not pressed during the hearing and thus dismissed.

                          2. Erroneous Exclusion and Inclusion of Comparables:
                          - Microgenetics Systems Ltd.: The TPO excluded this comparable based on a turnover filter of Rs. 5 crores. The Tribunal directed the TPO/AO to reconsider this comparable after applying all filters and functional profiles.
                          - R Systems International Ltd.: The Tribunal found that audited financial data for the relevant year was available. The TPO/AO was directed to include this comparable after proper evaluation.
                          - TCS E-Serve International Ltd. and TCS E-Serve Ltd.: These were excluded as their functional profiles were different from the assessee's, involving software development activities without segmental details for ITeS/BPO activities.

                          3. Rejection of R Systems International Limited:
                          The Tribunal directed the TPO/AO to consider R Systems International Ltd. as a comparable, given the availability of relevant financial data.

                          4. Inclusion of TCS E-Serve International Limited and TCS E-Serve Limited:
                          These companies were excluded from the list of comparables due to their different functional profiles and lack of segmental data.

                          5. Treatment of Gain/Loss from Foreign Exchange Variation and Provision for Doubtful Debts:
                          The Tribunal upheld the TPO's approach of treating these as non-operating in nature, aligning with provisions in Rule 10TA and supporting case law.

                          6. Non-Granting of Appropriate Risk Adjustments:
                          The CIT(A) denied risk adjustments, and this decision was upheld by the Tribunal.

                          7. Treatment of Third-Party Cost Recoveries for Applying the Mark-Up:
                          The Tribunal agreed with CIT(A) that third-party expenses (travel, boarding, lodging) should have been marked up before recovery. The assessee's reliance on the Cheil Communication India Pvt. Ltd. case was found to be on a different factual footing.

                          8. Treatment of Outstanding Receivables from AE as an Unsecured Loan:
                          The Tribunal remanded the issue back to the TPO/AO for proper adjudication, emphasizing the need to verify the actual delay in invoice collection and apply the correct interest rate.

                          9. Exclusion of Certain Companies from Comparables List in Revenue's Appeal:
                          - Accentia Technology Pvt. Ltd.: Excluded due to an extraordinary event of merger.
                          - Eclerx Services Ltd.: Excluded due to different functional profiles.
                          - I Gate Global Services: Excluded due to lack of segmental data.
                          - Infosys BPO Ltd.: Excluded as it is a giant in software development, assumes higher risks, and had extraordinary economic events.

                          Conclusion:
                          The assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal directed the TPO/AO to reconsider certain comparables and verify specific details for proper adjudication. The order was pronounced on April 26, 2021.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found