Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 119/75-C.E. dated 30-4-1975 was available to job work where the goods sent as raw material were processed into a new and different product and the article received back was not the same article as sent.
Analysis: The notification extended exemption to job work where the article intended to undergo manufacturing process was supplied to the job worker and the same article was returned after the requisite process. On the facts recorded, scrap and metal were melted and converted by moulding, rolling, cutting and drawing into wires, so the goods returned were not the same article that had been supplied. The condition built into the notification was therefore not satisfied.
Conclusion: The notification did not apply to the case and the revision application failed.