Electricity distribution exemption is limited to the statutory service and does not cover goods transfers or most ancillary works

The exemption for transmission or distribution of electricity was confined to the statutory service itself under the Electricity Act, 2003 and did not extend to inter-company transfers of operation and maintenance materials or capital assets, so GST applied to those goods transfers. Employee deployment was taxable only where the arrangement was in substance a service supply; where employees were actually paid and controlled by the receiving utility, no service arose on those facts. Deposit contribution works, including shifting of service lines and related installations, were treated as distinct from exempt electricity distribution service and remained taxable.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the alleged electricity value chain and inter-company transfers of materials or assets between the utilities were outside the GST levy or covered by the exemption for transmission or distribution of electricity; (ii) whether deployment of employees between the utilities amounted to a taxable supply of service in all factual situations; and (iii) whether deposit contribution works were exempt or otherwise taxable.

Issue (i): whether the alleged electricity value chain and inter-company transfers of materials or assets between the utilities were outside the GST levy or covered by the exemption for transmission or distribution of electricity.

Analysis: The exemption entry under Notification No. 12/2017-C.T. (Rate) applies to services and not to goods. The constitutional reference to electricity duty does not exclude the entire value chain of transmission and distribution from GST. The relevant exemption is confined to the supply of transmission or distribution service by the utility to a recipient, and the activity must answer the statutory content of such service under the Electricity Act, 2003. On the facts, the inter se movement of operation and maintenance materials and transfer of capital assets did not become exempt merely because they were connected with electricity operations.

Conclusion: The challenge to GST on the inter-company transfer of operation and maintenance materials and capital assets failed, and the exemption was held inapplicable.

Issue (ii): whether deployment of employees between the utilities amounted to a taxable supply of service in all factual situations.

Analysis: The authority distinguished between two factual modes. Where the appellant paid salary and other employment costs to personnel still on its rolls and recovered the amounts from the other utility, the arrangement did not justify interference with the advance ruling. However, where the employees were actually paid by the other utility and were under that utility's control, no service was involved on those facts. The result therefore turned on the factual matrix of deployment and reimbursement.

Conclusion: The ruling was modified only to the limited extent that no service arises where the employees are in fact paid and controlled by the receiving utility; otherwise, the taxable character was sustained.

Issue (iii): whether deposit contribution works were exempt or otherwise taxable.

Analysis: Deposit contribution works such as shifting of service lines and related installation activities were held to be distinguishable from exempt electricity distribution service. The authority found no compelling reason to differ from the advance ruling classifying the activity under the relevant service entry and treating it as taxable.

Conclusion: Deposit contribution works were held taxable and not covered by the exemption.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to a limited factual extent on employee deployment, while the remainder of the advance ruling was maintained and the matter was disposed of accordingly.

Ratio Decidendi: An exemption for transmission or distribution of electricity applies only to the statutory service itself and does not extend to goods transfers or ancillary activities unless the factual arrangement itself amounts to the exempt service; employee deployment is taxable only where it is in substance a service arrangement and not where the workers are actually under the control and payment of the receiving utility.

---