Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the resolution plan approved by the committee of creditors satisfied the requirements for approval under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the related regulations.
Analysis: The plan had been approved by the committee of creditors with 100% voting share. The resolution professional placed the plan for approval after verifying compliance with the statutory requirements, including treatment of CIRP costs, payment to creditors, management and implementation structure, and the plan's feasibility and viability. The Tribunal limited its scrutiny to the parameters under the Code and the CIRP Regulations and noted that it could not substitute its own view for the commercial wisdom of the committee of creditors. It was also found that the plan was not contrary to Section 29A of the Code and complied with Regulations 37 to 39.
Conclusion: The resolution plan was approved.