TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the transfer pricing adjustment should be confined only to the international transactions with associated enterprises and whether the benefit of the +/- 5% tolerance range was available while benchmarking the imports; (ii) Whether market research expenses were capital in nature or allowable revenue expenditure.
Issue (i): Whether the transfer pricing adjustment should be confined only to the international transactions with associated enterprises and whether the benefit of the +/- 5% tolerance range was available while benchmarking the imports.
Analysis: The dispute arose from benchmarking of import transactions of crude edible oil and related imports. The Tribunal followed the earlier decision in the assessee's own case, as affirmed by the High Court, that adjustment under transfer pricing provisions must relate only to the international transactions and not to the entire manufacturing segment. It also noted that the assessee's alternate computation required verification, and that the applicable margin and the tolerance range had to be worked out on the restricted international transaction base.
Conclusion: The adjustment was to be restricted to the international transactions, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the +/- 5% tolerance range subject to verification. The Revenue succeeded only to that limited extent, and the assessee's cross-objection became infructuous.
Issue (ii): Whether market research expenses were capital in nature or allowable revenue expenditure.
Analysis: The market research payments were incurred for recurring monthly market information and did not bring into existence an enduring capital asset. The issue was already covered by the Tribunal's earlier orders in the assessee's favour, and no contrary material was shown.
Conclusion: The expenditure was allowable as revenue expenditure and the Revenue's challenge failed on this issue.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeals were partly allowed on the transfer pricing issue, while the disallowance of market research expenses was deleted. The assessee's cross-objections were dismissed as infructuous.
Ratio Decidendi: Transfer pricing adjustment must be confined to the international transactions with associated enterprises and cannot be extended to the entire domestic manufacturing segment; recurring market research expenditure incurred for business information is revenue in nature.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
