Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the second proviso to section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, inserted with effect from 01.04.2020, applies retrospectively so as to delete the disallowance for non-deduction of tax at source where the payee has furnished its return, taken the sum into account, paid tax, and furnished the requisite accountant's certificate under section 201(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payment in question was made to a non-resident payee whose income, on the record before the Tribunal, was not chargeable to tax in India. The payee had furnished its return of income and the supporting certificate required for the benefit of the first proviso to section 201(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal treated the second proviso to section 40(a)(i) as pari materia with the corresponding proviso to section 40(a)(ia), both being introduced to remove an anomaly and to operate as curative provisions. Relying on the judicial view that the analogous amendment in section 40(a)(ia) is retrospective, the Tribunal held that the amendment to section 40(a)(i) must also be given retrospective effect.
Conclusion: The second proviso to section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is retrospective, and the assessee could not be treated as in default for the disallowance. The additional ground was allowed and the disallowance was set aside.