Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal under Section 107 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, filed with a delay of more than 14 months, could be condoned and treated as maintainable.
Analysis: The appeal was required to be filed within three months from the date of communication of the order, and the statute permitted condonation only upto one month beyond that period. The delay in the present case was far beyond the statutory condonable limit. The limitation scheme under Section 107(2) read with Section 107(4) is a complete code for appeals under the Act, and therefore Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has no application.
Conclusion: The delay could not be condoned and the rejection of the appeal as time barred was / justified. The writ petition was rightly dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a special statute prescribes a complete limitation scheme for filing an appeal and limits condonation to a specified period, general limitation provisions cannot be invoked to enlarge that period.