Insolvency Professional Penalized for Misconduct in Resolution Professional Role

The Disciplinary Committee found an Insolvency Professional guilty of professional misconduct for accepting a Resolution Professional role without a valid Authorisation for Assignment (AFA) post-2019, despite explanations provided. The Committee imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000 and disposed of the Show Cause Notice, emphasizing regulatory compliance and the importance of adhering to AFA requirements for maintaining integrity and competence in insolvency proceedings.

---

---

Issues:
1. Violation of regulations by an Insolvency Professional regarding Authorisation for Assignment (AFA).

Detailed Analysis:
1. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) to an Insolvency Professional (IP) for accepting an assignment after 31st December, 2019 without a valid Authorisation for Assignment (AFA) from the Insolvency Professional Agency (IPA).

2. The SCN alleged contraventions of sections 208(2)(a) & (e) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, along with specific regulations and clauses of the IBBI (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016.

3. The IP submitted responses stating that he acted as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) in a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) before being ratified as the Resolution Professional (RP) in January 2020 without realizing the necessity of AFA due to its recent implementation.

4. The Disciplinary Committee (DC) considered the regulations, Code provisions, and IP submissions. Regulation 7A mandates IPs to have a valid AFA post-2019, and non-compliance constitutes professional misconduct.

5. Despite the IP's explanation, the DC found him guilty of professional misconduct for accepting the RP role without a valid AFA, imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000 by the IPA's Disciplinary Committee.

6. The DC, under Regulation 11 of the IBBI (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, disposed of the SCN without further action, acknowledging the IPA's disciplinary decision and forwarding the order to relevant authorities for information.

7. The judgment highlights the importance of regulatory compliance, emphasizing the necessity for IPs to adhere to AFA requirements and uphold professional conduct to maintain integrity and competence in insolvency proceedings.

---