Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessable value of the goods was to be determined under section 4(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and whether deductions were allowable in respect of transport charges, other delivery-related charges, sales tax and similar local taxes.
Analysis: The prices declared by the appellants were treated as delivery prices at the purchasers' premises and not as factory-gate prices at the time and place of removal. On that footing, the normal price at the place and time of removal was not known, bringing the case within section 4(2). The statutory deductions claimed in respect of transport and delivery charges, as well as sales tax and other taxes, were therefore permissible. The question whether some sales were through related persons was not ative of the deductions in the circumstances found.
Conclusion: The assessable value was to be worked out under section 4(2) with the claimed deductions allowed, and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.
Final Conclusion: The assessment dispute was decided in favour of the appellants by allowing deduction of delivery-related charges and taxes from the declared prices for valuation purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the factory-gate normal price at the time and place of removal is not ascertainable because the goods are sold on delivery basis, valuation must proceed under section 4(2) with permissible deductions for transport and similar charges and for taxes excluded from assessable value.