Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The challenge rested on the plea that the operational debt arose from invoices of 2014-2015 and that the application filed in 2019 was beyond the prescribed period. The cheque issued on 12.01.2016 was treated as an acknowledgment of liability, and the record also showed part payment on 16.02.2016 followed by dishonour of the cheque. On these facts, the claim was held to be within limitation. The precedent relied on by the appellant was distinguished because the present case involved a different factual situation and supported the respondent's case on limitation.
Conclusion: The limitation objection was rejected and the admission of the Section 9 application was upheld.