Tribunal Admits Application for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under IBC

The Tribunal admitted the application under Section 9 of the IBC, finding the Corporate Debtor in default of a debt exceeding the minimum amount specified in Section 4(1) of the IBC. Consequently, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated, appointing an Interim Resolution Professional and declaring a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. The Operational Creditor was directed to deposit funds for CIRP expenses, and communication of the order to relevant parties and the Registrar of Companies was mandated.

---

---

Issues:
1. Applicability of the notification raising the minimum default limit under Section 4 of the IBC.
2. Applicability of Section 10A of the IBC.
3. Definition and status of the applicant as an Operational Creditor.
4. Existence of any pre-existing dispute between the parties.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Applicability of the Notification Raising the Minimum Default Limit:
The Corporate Debtor contended that the application is not maintainable as it does not meet the increased pecuniary limit of one crore rupees, per the notification dated 24.03.2020. The Tribunal clarified that the notification is prospective and does not affect rights accrued before its issuance. The default occurred on 03.01.2020, prior to the notification, making the application maintainable.

2. Applicability of Section 10A of the IBC:
The Corporate Debtor argued that the default is a "Covid default" and thus protected under Section 10A, which suspends initiation of CIRP for defaults occurring after 25.03.2020. The Tribunal noted that the default date is 03.01.2020, predating the pandemic-related provisions. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court's judgment in Ramesh Kymal vs. M/s Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Pvt Ltd, explaining that Section 10A does not apply to defaults before 25.03.2020. Therefore, the application is not barred by Section 10A.

3. Definition and Status of the Applicant as an Operational Creditor:
The Corporate Debtor claimed that the applicant does not qualify as an Operational Creditor since no goods or services were supplied. The Tribunal rejected this argument, noting that the advance payment for goods constitutes an operational debt. The Corporate Debtor's failure to deliver the goods and return the advance payment substantiates the applicant's status as an Operational Creditor.

4. Existence of Any Pre-Existing Dispute:
The Corporate Debtor argued that a pre-existing dispute existed, citing disruptions due to the Covid-19 lockdown. The Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor did not raise any dispute within the statutory period after receiving the demand notice. The Tribunal observed that the Corporate Debtor acknowledged the debt and default in its communications, and the alleged dispute does not meet the criteria under Section 5(6) of the IBC.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal found the application complete and the Corporate Debtor in default of a debt exceeding the minimum amount stipulated under Section 4(1) of the IBC. Consequently, the Tribunal admitted the application and ordered the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed, and a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC was declared, prohibiting certain actions against the Corporate Debtor during the CIRP period. The Operational Creditor was directed to deposit a sum to cover expenses related to public notice and claim invitations. The Tribunal also ordered communication of the order to relevant parties and the Registrar of Companies for compliance.

Order:
1. The petition under Section 9 of the IBC is admitted.
2. A moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC is declared.
3. An Interim Resolution Professional is appointed.
4. The Operational Creditor is to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 for CIRP expenses.
5. The Registry is directed to communicate the order to relevant parties and the Registrar of Companies.

---