Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the issue relating to levy and recovery of interest on GST was to be examined in light of the amendment to section 50 of the CGST Act and the CBIC administrative instructions, and whether the matter required further response from the State and the CGST Council.
Analysis: The petitioners placed reliance on the notification bringing section 100 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 into force and on the CBIC communication directing recovery of interest only on the net cash tax liability for the stated period, with SCNs on gross tax payable to be kept in Call Book pending retrospective amendment. The Court also noticed the stand taken in similar matters before other High Courts, but directed the State and the CGST Council to obtain specific instructions and state their position on the issue.
Outcome: No final adjudication was made on the merits of the interest issue, and the matter was posted for a subsequent date for further response.