Premature bail in customs duty evasion case declined while investigation remained pending and incriminating material had been recovered.

Bail was declined in a case alleging customs duty evasion, undervaluation of imported goods and allied Penal Code offences, because investigation was still pending and the charge-sheet had not yet been filed. The Court treated the request as premature, noted recovery of incriminating material and currency, statements recorded under customs law, and the fact that one co-accused was still at large. Earlier authorities were distinguished on facts, and the non-compoundable nature of the alleged Penal Code offences was also noted.

---

---

Issues: Whether bail should be granted in a case involving alleged customs duty evasion, undervaluation of imported goods and allied offences while investigation is still pending.

Analysis: The allegations involved substantial undervaluation of imported goods, alleged evasion of customs duty, recovery of incriminating material and currency, and statements recorded under customs law. The charge-sheet had not yet been filed and one co-accused was still at large. In these circumstances, the request for bail was considered premature, and the cited decisions were found distinguishable on facts. The Court also noted that the alleged offences under the Penal Code were non-compoundable.

Conclusion: Bail was declined.

---