Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application for inventory, certification and drawing of representative samples under Section 52A(2) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is maintainable before a Judicial Magistrate and whether the order rejecting it on the ground of non-maintainability could stand.
Analysis: Section 52A(2) expressly permits the officer concerned to make an application to any Magistrate for certifying the inventory, taking photographs and allowing representative samples to be drawn in the presence of such Magistrate. Section 52A(3) requires the Magistrate to allow the application as soon as may be. The statutory scheme, reinforced by the treatment of the certified inventory, photographs and sample list as primary evidence under Section 52A(4), shows that the procedure is intended to be conducted under Magistrate supervision. The order under challenge, which held that such an application was not maintainable before the Magistrate and that the exercise lay only before the Executive Magistrate, was inconsistent with the statute and the governing legal position.
Conclusion: The application under Section 52A(2) was maintainable before the Judicial Magistrate and the order dismissing it for want of maintainability was set aside in favour of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: An application for inventory, sampling and certification under Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is maintainable before a Judicial Magistrate, and the Magistrate's certified proceedings constitute primary evidence under the statute.