Premature tax recovery barred while appeal and stay application remain pending; attachment notice under land revenue law was quashed.

Coercive recovery of a disputed tax demand should not be initiated while the statutory appeal and stay application remain pending before the appellate forum. The High Court noted that issuing attachment proceedings under Section 152 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 before the Tribunal decided the stay request would amount to premature coercive action against the assessee. On that basis, the impugned recovery notice was quashed and the pending appellate and stay proceedings were directed to be heard expeditiously.

---

---

Issues: Whether recovery proceedings by way of notice under Section 152 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 could be initiated while the appeal and stay application against the tax demand were pending before the Tribunal.

Analysis: The writ application arose from an attempt to recover tax demand through attachment proceedings notwithstanding that the assessee's appeal and stay application under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 were pending before the Tribunal. The Court noted that recovery in such circumstances would amount to coercive action before adjudication of the stay request, and that the departmental action could not proceed while the appellate and stay proceedings remained undecided. The Court also observed that the impugned notice under Section 152 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 ought not to have been issued for recovery of the demand in the face of the pending statutory proceedings.

Conclusion: The notice issued under Section 152 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 was quashed, and the assessee succeeded on the issue of premature coercive recovery.

Final Conclusion: Recovery proceedings could not be pursued pending consideration of the appeal and stay application, and the impugned attachment notice was set aside with a request that the Tribunal hear the pending proceedings expeditiously.

Ratio Decidendi: Coercive recovery of a disputed tax demand should not be initiated while the statutory appeal and stay application remain pending and undecided before the competent appellate forum.

---