Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders and consequential demand notice could be sustained when the pre-assessment show-cause notices and the assessment orders were not served on the assessee in the manner prescribed, and whether such non-service caused a violation of natural justice rendering the demand unenforceable.
Analysis: The challenge turned on the mode and proof of service. Rule 64(1)(b) of the Telangana State Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 prescribed the manner of service and did not contemplate service by e-mail. The record did not establish valid service of the show-cause notices or the assessment orders for the relevant periods, and the postal covers showed returned delivery with endorsements such as "addressee left". In the absence of valid service, the assessee was deprived of the opportunity to object and participate, resulting in prejudice and breach of natural justice.
Conclusion: The assessment orders and the consequential demand notice could not be sustained and were liable to be set aside.