TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows appeal delay, remands interest issue for fresh review under section 234E.</h1> <h3>M/s. Image Labels Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC (TDS), Uttra Pradesh</h3> M/s. Image Labels Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC (TDS), Uttra Pradesh - TMI Issues:Late filing of TDS statement leading to levy of late fee under section 234E of the Income-Tax Act, 1961; Validity of charging fee under section 234E while processing TDS returns filed under section 200(3) of the Act; Condonation of delay in filing appeals before CIT(A); Dismissal of appeals due to delay in filing or missing relevant orders under section 200A of the Act.Late Fee under Section 234E:The appellant filed TDS statements for various quarters with a delay, resulting in the Assessing Officer (AO) levying late fees under section 234E of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. Section 234E mandates a fee of Rs. 200 per day for late filing of TDS statements. The appellant challenged the validity of this fee, arguing that the provisions enabling the levy of this fee came into effect only from 1.6.2015. Citing a Karnataka High Court decision, the appellant contended that no fee under section 234E could be charged for TDS returns filed before 1.6.2015.Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals:The CIT(A) found some appeals filed by the appellant to be belated, with insufficient reasons for the delay. While the appellant claimed that clarity on the levy of interest under section 234E emerged post a High Court decision, the CIT(A) observed significant delays in filing the appeals, leading to dismissal of those with delays. The appellant's reasons for delay included a change in the registered office address and lack of communication regarding the demand orders under section 200A of the Act.Validity of Charging Fee under Section 234E while Processing TDS Returns:The appellant argued that the AO could only levy fees under section 234E while processing TDS returns under section 200(3) of the Act based on the provisions of section 200A(1)(c), (d), and (f). These provisions, according to the appellant, came into effect from 1.6.2015. The appellant's contention was supported by the Karnataka High Court's decision, emphasizing that the levy of interest under section 234E for TDS returns before 1.6.2015 would be illegal.Dismissal of Appeals for Missing Relevant Orders under Section 200A:Certain appeals were dismissed by the CIT(A) due to missing relevant orders under section 200A of the Act. The CIT(A) held that these appeals were defective as they were filed without the necessary orders. The Tribunal directed the appellant to file these orders before the CIT(A) for further consideration on merits.Conclusion:Considering the circumstances and the principle of ensuring substantive justice, the Tribunal condoned the delay in filing appeals and remanded the issue of interest under section 234E back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The Tribunal also directed the CIT(A) to allow the appellant to file the necessary orders under section 200A and consider the appeals on their merits. All appeals by the appellant were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
