Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a provision for taxation could be treated as a reserve or, alternatively, as a fund so as to be deducted from the cost of excluded investments in computing the capital base under the super profits tax and surtax provisions.
Analysis: The relevant schedules under both enactments require capital to be computed in the light of balance-sheet concepts and accounting usage. A provision made for current tax liability is not a reserve, because it is an amount set apart to meet an ascertained liability. Nor is it a fund, because there is no separate accumulation of assets or systematic earmarking for future use in the sense contemplated by the statutory scheme and ordinary accounting meaning. The Board circular dealing with reserve for unexpired risks did not assist, because that reserve related to a contingent future liability and not to a specific liability arising at the close of the accounting year.
Conclusion: The provision for taxation was not deductible from the cost of the excluded investments and could not augment the capital base; the answer was in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A specific provision for an ascertained tax liability of the current accounting year is neither a reserve nor a fund for purposes of computing capital under the relevant super profits tax or surtax schedules.