Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for computing chargeable profits under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the amount transferred by a banking company to the reserve fund in excess of the minimum required by section 17(1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, is excludible under rule 1(xi)(a) of Schedule I.
Analysis: Rule 1(xi)(a) permits exclusion only of the sum transferred to the reserve fund, but limits the deduction to the amount required to be transferred under section 17(1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The statutory language "not exceeding the amount required" makes the exclusion co-extensive only with the minimum mandatory transfer of not less than twenty per cent of profits. Any excess transfer, even if said to have been made pursuant to directions or advice of the Reserve Bank of India, is not a transfer required by section 17(1) and therefore does not fall within the allowance. The materials relied on did not establish a binding direction under section 35A compelling a transfer beyond the statutory minimum.
Conclusion: The excess amount transferred to the reserve fund was not deductible in computing chargeable profits. The question was correctly answered against the assessee.