Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2020 (12) TMI 642 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Insolvency petition deemed premature by Tribunal due to ongoing settlement talks and COVID-19 impact. The Tribunal concluded that the insolvency petition was premature and not fit for admission. It recognized the ongoing settlement discussions and the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Insolvency petition deemed premature by Tribunal due to ongoing settlement talks and COVID-19 impact.

                            The Tribunal concluded that the insolvency petition was premature and not fit for admission. It recognized the ongoing settlement discussions and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Corporate Debtor's business. The Tribunal disposed of the petition, granting liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh petition if the debt is not repaid within a reasonable time, subject to meeting the provisions and objectives of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. No order as to costs was issued.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Default in payment by the Corporate Debtor.
                            2. Classification of the loan account as a Non-Performing Asset (NPA).
                            3. Rescheduling of the loan repayment.
                            4. Actions taken by the Financial Creditor, including legal proceedings.
                            5. One Time Settlement (OTS) proposals and their acceptance.
                            6. Impact of COVID-19 on the Corporate Debtor's business.
                            7. Prematurity of the Insolvency Petition.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Default in Payment by the Corporate Debtor:
                            The Petitioner, a Public Sector Bank, provided a term loan and overdraft facility to the Corporate Debtor, who failed to repay the amount as per the loan agreement. The total outstanding amount claimed by the Petitioner was Rs. 15,22,11,780. Despite several notices and requests, the Corporate Debtor did not make any payments till the date of the Petition.

                            2. Classification of the Loan Account as a Non-Performing Asset (NPA):
                            The Financial Creditor classified the loan accounts of the Corporate Debtor as NPA on 29.05.2014 and discontinued charging interest from 01.05.2014. The Corporate Debtor contested this classification, arguing that the Petitioner unilaterally ignored the revised restructuring of the term loan.

                            3. Rescheduling of the Loan Repayment:
                            The Corporate Debtor requested rescheduling of the term loan from quarterly to half-yearly installments, which was initially accepted by the Petitioner. However, the Petitioner later cancelled the restructuring order, leading to further disputes.

                            4. Actions Taken by the Financial Creditor, Including Legal Proceedings:
                            The Financial Creditor took possession of the Corporate Debtor’s immovable assets under SARFAESI and initiated legal proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and the High Court of Karnataka. The High Court quashed the NPA classification and directed the Corporate Debtor to make certain payments, which were complied with.

                            5. One Time Settlement (OTS) Proposals and Their Acceptance:
                            The Corporate Debtor approached the Petitioner for a one-time settlement (OTS), which was accepted by the Petitioner. However, the Corporate Debtor sought an extension for the repayment schedule due to business disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Petitioner acknowledged this request but no final decision was made.

                            6. Impact of COVID-19 on the Corporate Debtor's Business:
                            The Corporate Debtor’s business was significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a temporary lull in operations and revenue. This affected their ability to meet the repayment schedule, prompting them to seek deferment.

                            7. Prematurity of the Insolvency Petition:
                            The Tribunal observed that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) cannot be used as a substitute for debt recovery and should not be invoked prematurely. Given the ongoing settlement talks and the Corporate Debtor’s willingness to pay, the Tribunal found the Petition premature. The Tribunal emphasized that the IBC is not intended to push viable companies into insolvency.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal concluded that the Petition was premature and not fit for admission. It acknowledged the ongoing settlement discussions and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Corporate Debtor’s business. The Tribunal disposed of the Petition, granting liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh Petition if the debt is not repaid within a reasonable time, provided a case is made out as per the provisions and objectives of the IBC. No order as to costs was made.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found