Interest deduction on borrowed funds for investment income, capitalisation of disallowed interest, and TDS credit in interest recomputation.

Interest expenditure is deductible under section 57 where borrowed funds have a clear nexus with investments and term deposits generating taxable interest, particularly when the assessee follows the mercantile system and the liability has accrued. The note also states that any interest expenditure disallowed on this basis may be capitalised to the cost of the relevant shares and securities for future capital gains computation. Ad hoc additions for personal household expenses should rest on evidence and may be reduced where only estimate-based disallowance is made. Interest under sections 234A, 234B and 234C is to be recomputed after giving credit for tax deductible at source, in line with the assessee's assessed income and tax credit position.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the assessee was entitled to deduction of interest expenditure under section 57 on borrowed funds used for investments and term deposits, (ii) whether the portion of interest disallowed could be capitalised to the cost of shares and securities, (iii) whether the ad hoc addition for personal household expenses was sustainable, and (iv) whether the interest under sections 234A, 234B and 234C required recomputation after giving credit for tax deductible at source.

Issue (i): whether the assessee was entitled to deduction of interest expenditure under section 57 on borrowed funds used for investments and term deposits.

Analysis: The assessee was a notified person under the Special Court regime, but the material on record and the past orders in the assessee's own case showed that the interest liability had accrued and that a nexus existed between the borrowed funds, the investments originally made, and the term deposits that earned taxable interest. The recurring acceptance of the claim in earlier years, the mercantile method of accounting, and the absence of any effective cancellation of the interest obligation supported allowability. The Tribunal followed the principle of consistency and accepted that the expenditure was deductible against the interest income.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): whether the portion of interest disallowed could be capitalised to the cost of shares and securities.

Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier view that interest relatable to investment activity, to the extent disallowed as expenditure, forms part of the cost of acquisition of the relevant shares and securities for the purpose of computing future gains. The same approach had been accepted in comparable cases and was applied mutatis mutandis.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): whether the ad hoc addition for personal household expenses was sustainable.

Analysis: The addition was estimated without direct evidence and the Tribunal followed the earlier approach adopted in the assessee's family group matters, where such disallowances had been scaled down on a reasonable basis. Consistent with those decisions, the sustained addition was further reduced.

Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iv): whether the interest under sections 234A, 234B and 234C required recomputation after giving credit for tax deductible at source.

Analysis: The Tribunal accepted that the interest provisions applied, but directed recomputation by reducing the tax deductible at source on the income assessed, following the coordinate bench view in earlier years and similar matters.

Conclusion: The issue was decided partly in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed, with the principal additions deleted and the interest under the compensatory provisions directed to be recomputed in accordance with the assessee's tax credit position.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee follows the mercantile system and the evidence shows an accrued interest liability with a reasonable nexus to taxable investment income, the interest expenditure is deductible under section 57, and consistent findings accepted in earlier years should ordinarily be followed in the absence of any material change.

---