Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest on belated payment of tax was leviable under Section 24(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 or under Section 24(3-A) of that Act where the returns were filed after the prescribed date but within ten days of that date.
Analysis: The return-filing requirement under Rule 18(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules required dealers with the relevant turnover to file monthly returns by the 12th of the succeeding month. Section 24(1) and Section 13(2) were read together to determine when tax became payable in self-assessment cases. The Court distinguished the earlier decision relied on by the petitioner, noting that in the present cases both the returns and the tax were filed after the prescribed date, but within ten days of that date. Section 24(3-A), introduced later, specifically covered returns filed within ten days after expiry of the prescribed period and required interest at the stipulated rate. The Court also held that an order is not invalid merely because the wrong provision is cited, if the action is otherwise supportable under the correct provision.
Conclusion: The applicable provision was Section 24(3-A) and not Section 24(3); the levy of interest was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a self-assessing dealer files the prescribed return after the due date but within the statutory grace period, interest is leviable under the specific provision governing belated returns, and citation of an incorrect provision in the impugned order does not by itself vitiate the levy if the power otherwise exists.