Co-operative society versus co-operative bank distinction triggers fresh review of deduction eligibility under the tax exemption provision.

The claim for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) required fresh examination in light of section 80P(4) and the later Supreme Court distinction between a co-operative society and a co-operative bank. The central question was whether a society engaged in advancing credit to members fell within the banking exclusion, which would deny the deduction. Because the earlier allowance had not considered that later ruling, and the assessee's own later years had already been sent back for reconsideration on the same basis, the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision on the facts and applicable legal test. The deduction claim was not finally decided on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) required reconsideration in light of section 80P(4) and the later Supreme Court ruling on the distinction between a co-operative society and a co-operative bank.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the assessee, though engaged in advancing credit to its members, was to be treated as a co-operative bank so as to be excluded from deduction by virtue of section 80P(4). The order under appeal had allowed the deduction without examining the impact of the later Supreme Court decision, and the same issue in the assessee's own subsequent years had already been remanded for fresh consideration after applying that decision. In these circumstances, the proper course was to send the matter back for a fresh decision on the facts and the applicable legal test.

Conclusion: The issue was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration; the assessee's claim was not finally decided on merits.

---