TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Grant of Anticipatory Bail for Alleged Possession of Smuggled Gold: Compliance with Conditions Essential</h1> <h3>ANOB T.R. Versus UNION OF INDIA, STATE OF KERALA</h3> ANOB T.R. Versus UNION OF INDIA, STATE OF KERALA - 2021 (375) E.L.T. 176 (Ker.) Issues: Applicant seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for alleged possession of smuggled gold and cash, accused 1 and 2 granted bail, applicant's health condition and cooperation with investigation.Analysis:1. The applicant approached the Court seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered by the Customs Preventive and Narcotics Unit. The prosecution alleged that accused 1 and 2 were found in possession of gold and cash during a routine vehicle check. Accused 1 and 2 claimed to be working for the applicant, who owns a gold manufacturing business. The applicant denied the allegations, stating that the gold was legally obtained for manufacturing ornaments. He provided documents to support his claim, asserting innocence and cooperation with the investigation.2. The Chief Judicial Magistrate found that the seized gold did not fall under the definition of smuggling under the Customs Act. Tax invoices and bills indicated legal possession of gold by various individuals for making ornaments. Accused 1 and 2 were granted bail, which was not challenged by the Customs Department. The applicant, citing health issues and the risk of contracting COVID-19, sought pre-arrest bail. The Court considered the facts, the willingness of accused 1 and 2 to cooperate, and the finality of their bail, concluding that the applicant should not be incarcerated if willing to cooperate.3. The Court allowed the bail application, directing the applicant to surrender before the Customs Department, cooperate with the investigation, and maintain certain conditions. These conditions included not influencing witnesses, appearing before the investigating officer when required, and refraining from similar offenses during the bail period. Any breach of these conditions would allow the prosecution to apply for bail cancellation before the jurisdictional court. The applicant was granted bail on the execution of a bond and sureties, considering his health condition and cooperation with the investigation.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
