Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the joint application for approval of the scheme of amalgamation and for dispensation of meetings of equity shareholders, preference shareholders, secured creditors, and unsecured creditors of the applicant companies should be allowed.
Analysis: The application was supported by affidavits, board resolutions, and the requisite creditor and shareholder consents. The material on record showed that the equity shareholders had consented unanimously, the secured creditors and unsecured creditors had largely consented in the prescribed majorities, and no preferential shareholder meeting was required for one company. The registered offices were within the Tribunal's territorial jurisdiction and the proposal was presented under the statutory framework governing compromise, arrangement, and amalgamation.
Conclusion: The application was allowed and the convening of the specified meetings was dispensed with on the terms recorded in the order.
Final Conclusion: The scheme application was accepted, and the matter was concluded by granting the requested procedural dispensation and issuing consequential directions to the statutory authorities.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory majority consents of shareholders and creditors are demonstrated by affidavits and supporting records, the Tribunal may dispense with convening the meetings and permit the scheme process to proceed.