TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Orders Release of Rs. 30 Lakhs for Student Education Amid Pandemic, Appeal Rights Clarified</h1> <h3>Directorate Of Enforcement Versus Dhruv Tewari</h3> Directorate Of Enforcement Versus Dhruv Tewari - TMI Issues:Challenge to provisional attachment order under PMLA Act - Release of funds for student's education - Adjudication of provisional attachment orders by Adjudicating Authority - Appealability of Adjudicating Authority's orders - Reserving right to challenge Adjudicating Authority's orders - Rendering impugned order otiose.Analysis:The case involved a challenge to a provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA Act) concerning various bank accounts and mutual fund accounts. The petitioner, a student studying in the USA, sought setting aside of the attachment order, claiming he had no involvement in any offense or proceeds of crime. The petitioner's late family members were implicated in criminal cases, but he was a minor at that time and not named in any case. The respondent argued that funds in the petitioner's accounts were proceeds of crime transferred by his late father. The Court refrained from delving into the controversy, emphasizing the petitioner's welfare and education amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.The Court, considering the circumstances and the petitioner's educational needs, directed the Directorate of Enforcement to release Rs. 30 lakhs to the petitioner from the attached funds, subject to certain conditions and undertakings. The Court highlighted the need to support the student during challenging times and did not delve into the broader issues of fund sources or potential wrongdoing, leaving those matters for future consideration.Subsequently, the Adjudicating Authority adjudicated the provisional attachment orders, which were appealable under the PMLA Act. The petitioner reserved the right to challenge these orders before the Appellate Authority. As a result, the impugned order dated 22.07.2020 was deemed redundant, and the appeal was allowed, with liberty granted to the respondent to pursue further legal actions if necessary. The judgment clarified the legal process, appeal mechanisms, and the specific context of the case concerning the release of funds for a student's education.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
