2020 (10) TMI 209 - HC - Central Excise

Appellant permitted to withdraw appeal challenging CESTAT order under Central Excise Act for Sabka Vishwas Scheme benefits.

M/s. Induction Hardening Co. Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise Nashik

The High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal challenging the CESTAT order under the Central Excise Act, 1944, in order to avail benefits ... Permission for withdrawal of appeal - Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - It is stated that though the application has been accepted by the respondents and all the dues have been paid by the appellant, appropriate order has not been passed on the application only on the ground of pendency of the present appeal. HELD THAT:- The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn - However, there shall be no order as to cost. Refund as per Rules. Issues Involved:Appeal challenging CESTAT order under Central Excise Act, 1944 | Availing benefit under Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019 | Unconditional withdrawal of pending appeal | Acceptance of application under the Scheme | Refund as per Rules.Analysis:The judgment pertains to an appeal filed under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging an order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The appellant sought to avail the benefits of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 introduced by the Central Government. However, one of the conditions for availing the benefits under the Scheme required the unconditional withdrawal of any pending appeal before the High Court or the Supreme Court. The appellant had already filed an application under the Scheme, which was accepted by the respondents. Despite the payment of all dues by the appellant, an appropriate order was not passed on the application due to the pendency of the present appeal.In light of the above circumstances, the appellant sought the withdrawal of the appeal to comply with the conditions of the Scheme. The High Court allowed the appeal to be withdrawn, emphasizing that there would be no order as to costs. Additionally, the judgment mentioned that a refund would be provided as per the rules governing such matters. The order was to be digitally signed by the Personal Assistant of the Court, with instructions for all concerned parties to act upon the production of a digitally signed copy of the order via fax or email.In conclusion, the judgment reflects the Court's consideration of the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal in order to benefit from the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019, and the subsequent allowance of the withdrawal without imposing any costs. The decision also ensured compliance with the Scheme's requirement of unconditional withdrawal of pending appeals for availing its benefits, while also addressing the refund process in accordance with the applicable rules.