Tribunal quashes assessments reopening, cites incorrect reasons by Assessing Officer. Assessees' appeals allowed.

The Tribunal quashed the reopening of assessments under sections 147/148 due to incorrect reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) and lack of material evidence provided to the assessees. Consequently, all additions totaling Rs. 5,12,500/- were deleted, and the appeals of the assessees were allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Reopening of assessment under sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Addition of Rs. 5,12,500/- on account of unexplained accommodation entry and commission.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Reopening of Assessment under Sections 147/148:
The primary issue was the validity of the reopening of assessment under sections 147/148. The assessee argued that the reasons recorded for reopening were based on incorrect and non-existing facts. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) relied on information from the Investigation Wing, which indicated that the assessee received accommodation entries from Shri Pradeep Kumar Jindal. However, it was later found that the entry was Rs. 5 lakhs instead of the recorded Rs. 15 lakhs. The material relied upon by the A.O. was not supplied to the assessee, and no opportunity for cross-examination was provided. The Tribunal noted that the A.O. did not verify the information and recorded reasons based on incorrect facts, showing a lack of application of mind. The objections raised by the assessee against the reopening were not disposed of before passing the reassessment order, violating the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. Thus, the reopening of the assessment was deemed unjustified and quashed.

2. Addition of Rs. 5,12,500/- on Account of Unexplained Accommodation Entry and Commission:
The A.O. made an addition of Rs. 5 lakhs as unexplained accommodation entry and Rs. 12,500/- as commission paid for obtaining the entry. The assessee contended that the addition was based on unverified information from the Investigation Wing and that no material evidence was provided to support the addition. The Tribunal observed that the A.O. did not supply the material or allow cross-examination of the statements relied upon. Consequently, the addition was based on incorrect and non-existing facts. Since the reopening of the assessment was quashed, the addition was also deleted.

Separate Judgments:
The Tribunal delivered a common consolidated order for all the appeals, following the decision in the case of Shri Hanuman Prasad Aggarwal. The reopening of assessments and the additions were quashed for all the assessees involved.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal quashed the reopening of assessments under sections 147/148 due to incorrect and non-existing reasons recorded by the A.O. and the failure to provide material evidence to the assessees. Consequently, all additions were deleted, and the appeals of the assessees were allowed.

---