Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2020 (9) TMI 524 - Tri - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal approves merger scheme for operational efficiencies & revenue growth The Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme of Merger by Absorption, approving the merger of two companies for improved operational efficiencies and revenue ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal approves merger scheme for operational efficiencies & revenue growth

                            The Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme of Merger by Absorption, approving the merger of two companies for improved operational efficiencies and revenue generation. The Scheme was found commercially viable and compliant with legal and regulatory requirements. The Tribunal ordered the dissolution of the Transferor Company without winding up, setting the Appointed Date as 1st April, 2019. All statutory compliances were met, ensuring fairness and reasonableness in the best interest of the companies and stakeholders involved.




                            Issues:
                            1. Sanction of the Tribunal sought under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the Scheme of Merger by Absorption.
                            2. Compliance with the observations of the Regional Director (Western Region) regarding the proposed Scheme.
                            3. Observations and report of the Official Liquidator regarding the affairs of the Transferor Company.
                            4. Fairness and reasonableness of the Scheme in accordance with the law and public policy.

                            Analysis:

                            Issue 1: Sanction of the Tribunal under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013
                            The Petitioner Companies sought approval for the Scheme of Merger by Absorption of OCS Technical Solutions India Private Limited by FASSCO International (India) Private Limited. The Petitioner Companies passed Board Resolutions approving the Scheme, highlighting the benefits of revenue generation, cost optimization, operational efficiencies, and synergies. The proposed merger aimed at improving organizational capabilities, reducing overheads, and ensuring operational rationalization. The Tribunal found the Scheme commercially viable and feasible. The Petitioners complied with all requirements as per the Tribunal's directions and filed necessary compliance reports.

                            Issue 2: Compliance with Regional Director's Observations
                            The Regional Director's report highlighted various observations, including compliance with accounting standards, appointed date, fee set-off provisions, approval by members and creditors, and filing of necessary affidavits. The Petitioner Companies undertook to comply with these observations through their counsel, ensuring adherence to accounting standards, appointed date effectiveness, fee set-off, and approval requirements. The Tribunal accepted the clarifications and undertakings provided by the Petitioner Companies, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements.

                            Issue 3: Observations and Report of the Official Liquidator
                            The Official Liquidator's report confirmed that the affairs of the Transferor Company were conducted properly and not prejudicial to shareholders' interests. The report recommended the dissolution of the Transferor Company without the process of winding up. Based on the report and material on record, the Tribunal found the Scheme fair, reasonable, non-violative of law, and not contrary to public policy. Consequently, the Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme and fixed the Appointed Date as 1st April, 2019, ordering the dissolution of the Transferor Company without winding up.

                            Issue 4: Fairness and Reasonableness of the Scheme
                            The Tribunal, after reviewing all statutory compliances and reports, concluded that the Scheme was fair, reasonable, and in line with legal requirements. All concerned regulatory authorities were directed to act upon receipt of the Order, and interested parties were given liberty to apply for necessary directions. The Petitioner Companies were instructed to file copies of the Order and Scheme with the Registrar of Companies and Superintendent of Stamps within specified timelines. Overall, the Tribunal found the Scheme compliant, fair, and in the best interest of the involved companies and stakeholders.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme of Merger by Absorption, ensuring compliance with legal provisions, accounting standards, and regulatory requirements. The approval highlighted the commercial viability, operational efficiencies, and benefits of the merger, ultimately leading to the dissolution of the Transferor Company without winding up. The detailed analysis and compliance with statutory obligations ensured a fair and reasonable outcome for all parties involved.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found