Refund delay condonation under VAT rules lies with the Assessing Officer where the refund provision itself so empowers.

Delay in filing a refund application under Section 13 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act is governed by Rule 47, which requires the claim and supporting documents to be filed before the assessing authority within the prescribed time and expressly empowers that authority to condone delay for recorded reasons. That specific rule controls the refund procedure, including delay-related default, so the Assessing Officer is the proper authority to consider condonation. Section 20A is only an enabling provision where no other officer has been specifically empowered under the Act or Rules, and therefore does not apply to Section 13 refund applications. The delay-condonation power lies with the Assessing Officer, not the Deputy Commissioner.

---

---

Issues: Whether the delay in filing an application for refund under Section 13 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was to be condoned by the Assessing Officer under Rule 47 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 or only by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 20A of the Act.

Analysis: Section 13 permits refund in the manner and subject to the conditions prescribed. Rule 47 specifically requires the application to be filed before the assessing authority within the prescribed time and contains a proviso empowering that authority to condone delay for recorded reasons. That specific prescription governs the refund application process and covers delay in filing the application and supporting documents. Section 20A is an enabling provision for condonation where no other officer has been specifically empowered under the statute or the rules. Since Rule 47 itself vests the power in the Assessing Officer, Section 20A does not apply to applications under Section 13.

Conclusion: The power to condone delay lay with the Assessing Officer under Rule 47, not with the Deputy Commissioner under Section 20A.

---