Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount of Rs. 58,312 written off against an under-broker was allowable as a business loss under section 10(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The assessee had advanced sums to an under-broker in the course of a business in which the use of brokers and under-brokers was essential and customary. The amount was not being claimed as brokerage expenditure under the cash system of accounting, but as a loss suffered in the business when the amount became irrecoverable on the death of the under-broker. The Tribunal found that such advances were made as a matter of commercial expediency and that the loss arose in the course of the business. On those facts, the write-off was treated as a trading loss incidental to the business.
Conclusion: The amount was allowable as a business loss under section 10(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An amount advanced in the course of business and becoming irrecoverable in the relevant year is deductible as a business loss if it is incidental to the business and arises from commercial expediency, even where the assessee follows the cash system of accounting.