Windmill sale treated as slump sale under Income Tax Act; Revenue's appeal dismissed, CIT(A)'s decision upheld.

The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to treat the sale of windmills as a slump sale, computing the capital gains under Section 50B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee's cross objections were also dismissed as they became infructuous with the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on slump sale of windmills.
2. Classification of the windmills as a separate undertaking under the definition of slump sale.
3. Computation of capital gains under Section 50B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition Made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on Slump Sale of Windmills:
The AO found that the assessee had sold three windmills and declared the transaction as a slump sale, offering the sum as long-term capital gains under Section 50B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The AO, however, denied this claim, treating the gains as short-term capital gains under Section 50 of the Act. The AO’s reasoning was based on the fact that the assessee did not maintain separate books of accounts for each windmill and had not provided a balance sheet or profit and loss account specific to the windmill business activity.

2. Classification of the Windmills as a Separate Undertaking Under the Definition of Slump Sale:
The CIT(A) examined the slump sale agreements and found that the windmills were sold as a going concern, inclusive of all assets such as land and buildings, without separate valuation of each asset. The CIT(A) observed that the assessee had been claiming deductions under Section 80IA from 2009-10 onwards, which the AO had not disputed. The CIT(A) concluded that each windmill constituted a separate undertaking under the definition of slump sale, directing the AO to treat the sale as a slump sale and compute the gains accordingly.

During the appeal, the revenue argued that the windmills should be treated as part of the company's assets rather than separate undertakings, citing the lack of separate books of accounts and the definition of undertaking under the Companies Act. The assessee countered by stating that the Income Tax Act's definition of undertaking includes any part of an undertaking or unit, and that the windmills were separate undertakings despite being included in the block of assets.

3. Computation of Capital Gains Under Section 50B of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The CIT(A) noted that Section 50B is a special provision for computing capital gains in case of slump sale, which does not require considering the indexed cost of acquisition or improvement. The net worth of the undertaking is considered as the cost of acquisition and improvement. The CIT(A) directed the AO to compute the long-term capital gains as the difference between the lump-sum consideration and the net worth of the undertaking.

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, agreeing that the windmills constituted a separate undertaking and that the sale should be treated as a slump sale under Section 50B. The Tribunal also referenced various judicial precedents supporting the view that non-maintenance of separate books of accounts does not disqualify the transaction from being treated as a slump sale.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to treat the sale of windmills as a slump sale, computing the capital gains under Section 50B. The assessee's cross objections were also dismissed as they became infructuous with the dismissal of the revenue's appeal. The order was pronounced in the open court on 19th June 2020.

---