Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation and whether delay beyond the statutory period could be condoned.
Analysis: The statutory scheme permits an appeal to be filed within 30 days, with a further condonable period not exceeding 15 days on sufficient cause being shown. The record showed that the appellant had knowledge of the approval of the resolution plan at least by 04.07.2019, while the appeal was filed much beyond the maximum permissible period. Pending proceedings before the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and the appellant's asserted inability to quantify the claim were held not to constitute a legal impediment to filing the appeal within limitation. The Tribunal also noted that when jurisdiction is barred by limitation, it could not go into the merits of the challenge.
Conclusion: The appeal was held to be time barred and the request for condonation beyond the statutory limit was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Under section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, an appeal cannot be entertained beyond the outer limit of limitation, and pendency of related proceedings or inability to quantify claims does not, by itself, amount to sufficient cause for extending that statutory period.