Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the writ petition challenging the appellate order was to be entertained notwithstanding the statutory appeal provided under the GST enactments, when the appellate tribunal had not yet been constituted.
Analysis: The impugned order was appealable under the statutory appellate framework, but the tribunal was not in place. The applicable removal of difficulties order provided that, in such a situation, the period for filing appeal would run from the date the President or State President of the Appellate Tribunal entered office after constitution. In that setting, the petitioner was not required to forgo the appellate remedy and could await constitution of the tribunal. Since the goods had already been released, no immediate prejudice was shown.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not pursued on merits and the petitioner was left to avail the statutory appeal before the tribunal in accordance with the removal of difficulties order.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory appeal is available but the appellate tribunal has not been constituted, the litigant may wait and file the appeal upon constitution of the tribunal in terms of the applicable removal of difficulties order.