Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (7) TMI 286 - NAPA - GST

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Respondent found guilty of profiteering in GST rate reduction case, directed to refund, face penalties The Respondent was found to have profiteered by not passing on the benefit of a GST rate reduction on cinema tickets to consumers. The Directorate General ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Respondent found guilty of profiteering in GST rate reduction case, directed to refund, face penalties

                          The Respondent was found to have profiteered by not passing on the benefit of a GST rate reduction on cinema tickets to consumers. The Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) calculated the profiteering amount to be Rs. 30,13,058/-, with the Respondent increasing base ticket prices post-GST rate reduction. The Respondent was directed to reduce ticket prices, deposit the profiteered amount with interest in Consumer Welfare Funds, and faced penalties under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. Jurisdictional authorities were tasked with monitoring compliance within three months, with the order being delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Alleged profiteering by not passing on GST rate reduction benefits.
                          2. Examination of whether GST rate reduction was passed on to recipients.
                          3. Calculation and determination of profiteering amount.
                          4. Penalty and compliance directives.

                          Issue 1: Alleged profiteering by not passing on GST rate reduction benefits.

                          The Applicant No. 1 filed an application alleging that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% effective from 01.01.2019 on cinema tickets. The DGAP conducted an investigation and reported that the Respondent increased the base prices of tickets instead of reducing the final price, thus not passing on the GST reduction benefit to consumers.

                          Issue 2: Examination of whether GST rate reduction was passed on to recipients.

                          The DGAP confirmed that the GST rate on "Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films where the price of admission ticket was above one hundred rupees" was indeed reduced from 28% to 18% effective from 01.01.2019. The legal requirement under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 mandates that any reduction in tax rate must result in a commensurate reduction in prices. The DGAP reported that the Respondent did not pass on this benefit, as evidenced by the increased base prices of tickets post-GST rate reduction.

                          Issue 3: Calculation and determination of profiteering amount.

                          The DGAP calculated the profiteering amount by comparing the average base prices of tickets before and after the GST rate reduction. The Respondent had increased the base prices from Rs. 117.18 to Rs. 127.12 for 2D movies and from Rs. 195.32 to Rs. 211.86 for 3D movies. The DGAP determined that the Respondent had profiteered by Rs. 11.73 per ticket for 2D movies and Rs. 19.52 per ticket for 3D movies, resulting in a total profiteering amount of Rs. 30,13,058/-. The DGAP also noted that the Respondent adjusted the ticket prices commensurately only from 08.02.2019.

                          Issue 4: Penalty and compliance directives.

                          The Authority found that the Respondent had contravened the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 by not passing on the GST rate reduction benefit. The Respondent was directed to reduce ticket prices and deposit the profiteered amount of Rs. 30,13,058/- along with 18% interest in the Central Consumer Welfare Fund (CWF) and Telangana State CWF. The Respondent was also liable for a penalty under Section 171 (3A) of the CGST Act, 2017. The jurisdictional Commissioners of CGST/SGST Telangana were directed to monitor compliance, and a report was to be submitted within three months.

                          The order was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic and was passed under the Notification No. 55/2020, Central Tax dated 27.06.2020. Copies of the order were supplied to the Applicants, Respondent, and Commissioners CGST/SGST for necessary action.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found