Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 23A(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 applied to the assessee-company for the assessment year 1954-55, having regard to its commercial profits and financial position.
Analysis: Section 23A(1) could be invoked only where the non-distribution of dividend was not justified by losses or the smallness of profits, judged on commercial principles from the standpoint of a prudent businessman. The Court distinguished assessable income from commercial or accounting profits, and held that an item included in assessable income did not automatically form part of distributable profits. On the balance-sheet and profit and loss account, the company had a very weak financial position, heavy indebtedness, doubtful recoveries and a negligible surplus, so any dividend declaration would have been unreasonable and at the expense of creditors. The disputed character of the Government dues also reinforced the conclusion that the directors' decision not to declare dividend was not unreasonable.
Conclusion: Section 23A(1) was not attracted. The reference was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of section 23A, the Income-tax Officer must determine distributable commercial profits on commercial principles and from the standpoint of a prudent businessman, and an amount included in assessable income does not by itself constitute accounting profits available for dividend.