Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification, and whether the duty demand raised on denial of that benefit could survive.
Analysis: The demand of duty arose solely from denial of the exemption under Notification No. 01/2010-CE. The earlier appellate order denying the benefit had already been set aside by the Tribunal. Once that order was no longer in force, the basis for treating the appellant as ineligible for the exemption disappeared, and the proceedings founded on such denial could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the exemption benefit, and the duty demand based on its denial was unsustainable.